Author name: lycia

Tax Reform

Impacts of the Tax Reform and ITCMD: What Changes in Estate and Succession Planning?

The Tax Reform approved by Constitutional Amendment No. 132/2023 (EC 132/23) has not only affected consumption taxation, but it has also introduced significant changes to the Inheritance and Donation Tax (ITCMD), which directly impact estate and succession planning. The regulations regarding these changes to the ITCMD are outlined in Complementary Bill No. 108/2024 (PLP 108/2024, Book II, Articles 163 et seq.), which has been approved by the Chamber of Deputies and is currently being processed by the Federal Senate. The text of PLP 108/2024 aims to standardize and harmonize ITCMD regulations, as they vary significantly across different States and the Federal District, which have the authority to enact and enforce the tax. While the impact of the reform will depend on individual circumstances, we highlight below seven key changes introduced by the bill: 1. Taxable Event (Article 164) The ITCMD is levied on the donation of assets, rights, and values between living persons, and on transfers upon death (inheritance or bequest). PLP 108/2024 equates the transfer between related persons declared as onerous to a donation if there is no proof of financial capacity to acquire the asset or right; the same occurs in the forgiveness of debt by liberality and without verifiable business justification. Related parties include: (i) spouses, partners, or relatives up to the third degree, and (ii) legal entities in which such individuals hold executive or ownership positions. 2. Tax Immunity for Non-Profit Institutions (Articles 165–168) PLP 108/2024 regulates ITCMD immunity for donations received or made by non-profit entities with public or social purposes, as provided for in EC 132/2023. Each State and the Federal District will define the process for recognition of tax immunity. However, in any case, institutions must prove that the donations are linked to their institutional purposes and comply with the general requirements for enjoying tax immunities set out in the National Tax Code (Article 14). Among the requirements are the non-distribution of any portion of assets or income and the complete application of resources to the maintenance of institutional objectives. 3. Timing of Taxable Event: Impacts on Trusts (Articles 169–172) The definition of trust for ITCMD purposes is the same as for income tax. The applicable rules extend to both foreign contracts and domestic trust agreements that share similar characteristics. The assets and rights within a trust abroad remain the property of the settlor until they are distributed to the beneficiary or the settlor dies, whichever occurs first. ITCMD will be triggered at either event. If the settlor irrevocably waives rights to the assets, tax may apply earlier. 4. Tax Base: Market Value of the Asset (Articles 173–177) The ITCMD calculation basis will now be the market value of the asset transferred, which can significantly increase the tax due when compared to the calculation based on the reference venal value or the IPTU. For transfer of publicly traded shares, the calculation basis will correspond to the closing price on the day before valuation. For others private company interests, including those that have not been actively traded for more than 90 days, PLP 168/2024 stipulates that the ITCMD will be calculated using a suitable methodology appropriate to the quotas and shares, and will correspond at least to the net worth adjusted by the valuation of assets and liabilities at market value, plus the market value of goodwill. This calculation methodology – which no longer considers the equity value, but the market value of the assets – meets a request from state tax authorities. Its provision in the law could substantially impact the amount of tax due for companies with undervalued assets in their accounting, such as real estate holdings. The reference to the use of a ‘technically suitable and adequate methodology’ also creates some uncertainty, as it broadens the valuation tools to lead to the so-called ‘fair value’ of shares and quotas, which can be achieved using different techniques, such as discounted cash flow or market multiples. While these valuation methods are common in corporate transactions, they may take into account numerous variables, including risk factors, costs and expenses, intangible assets, and patents for new technologies, which tax authorities have not historically utilized. On a positive note, this legislation allows for the deduction of the deceased’s debts from the ITCMD base, provided that their origin, authenticity, and pre-existence are adequately proven. 5. Progressive Tax Rates: Higher Taxation on Large Estates (Art. 178) PLP 108/2024 introduces progressive ITCMD rates based on the value of the asset or right transferred. While progressive taxation is already adopted by some States, even based on criteria other than the value of the asset or right, the change may represent a significant shift for States that currently apply a flat rate, such as São Paulo, Minas Gerais, and Paraná. The so-called ‘large estates’, as defined in state or district legislation, will be taxed at the maximum rate, currently set at 8%. Although there is an old legislative proposal to raise the maximum ITCMD rate to 16% (Senate Resolution Bill No. 57/2019), it is still under consideration. 6. Liable Parties. Joint and Several Liability (Articles 179–181) In addition to identifying the heirs and donees as ITCMD taxpayers in the case of causa mortis transfers and donations, respectively, PLP 108/2024 specifies the third parties who may be held jointly and severally liable for paying the tax. These parties include the donor, the estate, notaries, financial institutions, and any other individual or entity responsible for the administration, custody, and registration of movable or immovable property, along with the associated rights of the transfer. Additionally, the transferee and any individual or legal entity that contributes to the concealment or disguise of the causa mortis transfer or donation are also liable. 7. Tax Authority Jurisdiction for Domestic and International Transfers (Arts. 182–184) PLP 108/2024 thus regulates the competence to institute and collect ITCMD: a.1. in Brazil → State/DF where the property, or most of it, is located; a.2. abroad: b.1. For inheritance: b.2. For donation: b.3. All parties domiciled abroad → State/DF where the

News

STF declares 25% Income Tax on Retirement Payments to Non-Resident Unconstitutional

STF declares 25% Income Tax on Retirement Payments to Non-Resident Unconstitutional The Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) has ruled that the 25% income tax withheld at source on retirement and pension payments made to individuals residing abroad is unconstitutional. The decision was issued in Extraordinary Appeal (ARE) 132749, under the General Repercussion system (Theme 1174). The withholding obligation was based on Article 7 of Law 9,779/99, which equates pension and retirement income remitted abroad with income from labor or services for tax purposes. According to the majority opinion, led by Justice Dias Toffoli, merely residing outside Brazil does not reflect greater economic capacity and therefore cannot justify a higher tax burden compared to retirees residing in Brazil. The case in question involved a retiree living in Portugal who received the equivalent of Brazil’s minimum wage yet was still subject to the 25% withholding tax. The STF found the tax rule unconstitutional for violating the constitutional principles of progressivity, equality, non-confiscation, and the obligation to protect the elderly. While the decision takes effect from its publication and has binding authority, it does not prevent the future enactment of legislation that differentiates tax treatment between residents and non-residents—so long as such differentiation respects constitutional principles of ability to pay and proportionality. In this context, Bill 1418/2007, which proposes a differentiated income tax treatment for non-resident individuals, remains under discussion in the Chamber of Deputies, though it has been inactive since 2021. If you have questions about how this ruling may affect your tax obligations or planning, our tax law team is available to assist. Contact us at tributario@lbm-legal.com.br

News

STF Rules That Income Tax Does Not Apply to Asset Donations at Market Value

In a unanimous decision issued in AgReg in RE 1.439.539/RS, the First Panel of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) ruled out the requirement of Income Tax in a case involving the donation of assets by an individual as an advance inheritance. The tax had been levied on the capital gain corresponding to the difference between the acquisition cost and the value assigned to the assets at the time of donation. However, Justice Flávio Dino, reporting the case, emphasized two key points that led the Court to reject the tax: (i) no increase in the donor’s net worth occurs in a donation, as the donor’s total assets are reduced by the gift; and (ii) the donation is already subject to Estate and Gift Tax (ITCMD) at the state level, meaning that applying federal income tax would constitute unconstitutional double taxation on the same event. While this STF decision does not have binding effect for all courts, it sets an important judicial precedent that can be used to challenge similar tax assessments. It provides greater legal certainty for individuals who wish to donate assets at market value as part of an inheritance plan, particularly in cases involving family asset planning and succession strategies. If you have questions about how this STF decision may impact your donation strategy, inheritance planning, or tax obligations, our tax law team is ready to help. Reach out to us at tributario@lbm-legal.com.br.

Information​

DIRPF 2025: Deadline for Filing the Brazilian Income Tax Return Ends May 30

If you’re required to submit your 2025 Brazilian Income Tax Return (DIRPF), stay alert: the deadline to file is May 30, 2025. The obligation applies to individuals who, during the 2024 calendar year, fall under any of the criteria outlined in the Normative Instruction RFB 2255/2025. Who Must File the DIRPF 2025? What Do You Need to Prepare Your Income Tax Return? To avoid errors and delays in filing your DIRPF, make sure to gather the proper documentation. Check out the main documents: Pre-Filled Income Tax Return The Brazilian Federal Revenue offers a pre-filled income tax return, with data from previous declarations, “carnê-leão”, and third-party reports. For the 2025 filing, the pre-filled return was released on April 1st. Income Tax Return for Legal Entities Also Due May 30 If you are responsible for a corporate tax return, the 2025 deadline for legal entities is also May 30. Our tax team is ready to support you with the preparation and submission of your DIRPF 2025, ensuring compliance with ancillary obligations and helping you avoid tax penalties. 📧 Contact us at tributario@lbm-legal.com.br to schedule your consultation.

Scroll to Top